Location: Hong Kong
  • Currently 4.8174906 of 5
8,706 views
Alex Reviews DHS's FAST: The Machine That Reads "Malintent Minds" on The Alex Jones Show
Share this video

Homeland Security is already implementing technology to be enforced at security events which purportedly reads malintent on behalf of an individual who passes through a checkpoint. http://prisonplanet.tv/

Permanent link Video comments
  • Koomo0069
    @AKARaccoons oh no im not trying to insult you, you have done thats your self, but this is what people like you do every time they get box in. english this english that, it have nothing to do with what im talikng about. so enjoy big governemnt b/c in the end your ignorance is what going to land you in a FEMA CAMP

  • AKARaccoons
    @Koomo0069 If you're going to attempt to insult me, don't fail in the process. You're butchering the English language, which--amusing as it is--is most likely your native language, which merely makes this more sad than originally conceived.

  • Koomo0069
    @AKARaccoons thats ok watch your tv and suck your fingers the government will take good care of you

  • AKARaccoons
    @Koomo0069 I don't follow your flawed, if existent, logic.

  • Koomo0069
    @AKARaccoons your going to end up in a FEMA CAMP just off ignorance alone check!!!

  • docatomics
    ...wait , hold the plane, eye got a better idea. You-all take them braclets off , hand them to the piggy, and he will go install these zap braclets on the nikumpoops that are working so hard on this nonsense. Every time they think of another scam, they can zap themselves , until all the subjugation fantasys aren't part of their phycosis anymore, just like shock thereapy , only self treated.

  • Gwrawp
    what a whiney litle gobshite :) if he hates it so much he should just move country

  • videochemist
    Don't you know Alex? If you talk about this stuff that makes you a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy nut.

  • EvoIvedRabbit
    The drawback of having so many cable channels is that anyone can get a microphone.

  • infernoacid
    Wow... This guy sounds like he thinks he know what he's talking about.. But in reality he sounds completely retarded. BRAINWASHING!! OMG!! How can people take this seriously? Its as low as fox news. And thats just about as bad as you can go. Fox news is whats wrong with america, especially from an outside point of view.

  • AKARaccoons
    Holy crap. It's like this guy is retarded. Oh--wait...Advocates Fox News? Check... Thinks the government is evil? Check... ...Oh yeah, he is. My bad.

  • kaa3164
    bwrwrwrwrainscanned.

  • bearhamo
    Liberty will die with a round of applause from the uninformed.

  • thepissedoffpotato
    wow just one more freedom taken away This is no longer the country I am use to

  • thepissedoffpotato
    maybe true but why do we need more lol

  • Marinkorpse
    Are you trying to smuggle a joint?

  • tsenzei
    But hey, you disagree? That's fine. You go trade your dignity, privacy, and all that, just don't expect others to give it all up for a highly unlikely if not statistically impossible hypothetical event.* *(Namely, that some form of attack occurs that other, already present security measures couldn't handle if people did their jobs right, that those further measures actually would.)

  • tsenzei
    In the last decade, the success or near success of terrorist attacks in US airplanes were due to negligence, and/or were carried out in such a manner that the new measures would have been ineffective anyway. (I don't blame security personnel for the most part mind you, I blame crazy bastards that want to blow shit up.) I don't care what morons think, or who they might sue in a hypothetical situation. Invasive radiation scans and synthetic profiling should not be a requirement for travel.

  • tsenzei
    It also means that those morons (and they are at that) should try suing DHS (which controls TSA) or TSA before they sue the airline, if indeed there was a lapse in security. That said, the financial liability of the TSA or the Airline is not my chief concern. Putting into place costly, invasive, and generally worthless, security measures that demean people in the name of "safety" does concern me.

  • tsenzei
    So those that, for example, travel for business, or otherwise are involved in traveling often or going to "security events" (such as sports events, according to the example video), shouldn't be fine? Once or twice may be fine, physically, but most people that travel, do so more often than that. As for airline security, at least in the US, that is handled by the TSA, and Airlines must comply with their regulations, as such, this is not simply a commercial issue, but a legal one as well.

  • DarrenGator
    The effect of said machine is cumulative so the average traveler will not be exposed to and significant harm. Words can be damaging and making it sound af if going though the machine once or twice will cause harm is irresponseable. As far as it being a requirement if the airlines it is thier right to use such an item. Lets face it if a terrorist blows up a plane how many morons are gonna sue the airlines for "not providing enough security".

  • tsenzei
    And, of course, there is the old quote that many ascribe to as well: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

  • tsenzei
    You will never, ever, be completely safe from harm, no matter how many "security" measures you put in place. Setting that aside however... these new measures have several flaws: 1. They are ineffective much of the time. Or 2: Are no more effective than "standard" security measures. Much of the time, terrorist attacks, or even the current financial issues across the globe, are accomplished through people not exercising the power they already have.

  • tsenzei
    General radiation and electromagnetic background is much less of an issue than targeted radiation. X-Ray scans for example, are limited, and the operators take care to avoid cumulative exposure by using lead-based shields and refined targeting. Even relatively "light" exposure adds to what is already there with the background radiation. Though some forms are safer than others. Regardless whether it is healthy or unhealthy: it is not currently, and should not be, a requirement for travel.

  • DarrenGator
    OMG dude do you know how much radiation and electromannetics you are exposed to every day? just the electronics in your home? The cell phone you use. Get educated before making a comment like this.